This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug inline-asm/23200] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] rejects "i"(&var + 1)


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23200

--- Comment #46 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-03 13:23:02 UTC ---
Created attachment 23236
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23236
gcc46-pr23200-2.patch

Or we could perhaps for EXPAND_INITIALIZER just try harder to look at SSA_NAME
definitions, as done in this patch.  EXPAND_INITIALIZER expansion is used just
in a couple of places, usually the expression is already known to be constant,
and in stmt.c it is for asm inputs with constraints that allow neither a
register nor memory.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]