This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/46957] http://blog.regehr.org/archives/320 Example 1
- From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 00:54:36 +0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/46957] http://blog.regehr.org/archives/320 Example 1
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-46957-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46957
Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2010.12.16 00:54:14
CC| |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-16 00:54:14 UTC ---
In addtion to that, loop unroller heuristics can be improved to predict that
all the statement in the loop will be constant after peeing. It is actualy not
that hard to do.
With this, we would fully unroll the loop in question.