This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug tree-optimization/44563] GCC uses a lot of RAM when compiling a large numbers of functions


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44563

--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-13 01:07:33 UTC ---
My profile was at -O2.  Concerning Jakub's callgrind, the -O0 compilation
finishes in about 44s for me. Profile is:
4349      3.8607  libc-2.11.1.so           libc-2.11.1.so           _int_malloc
3150      2.7963  cc1                      cc1                     
record_reg_classes.constprop.9
2881      2.5575  cc1                      cc1                     
htab_find_slot_with_hash
2104      1.8678  cc1                      cc1                     
ggc_set_mark
2039      1.8101  libc-2.11.1.so           libc-2.11.1.so          
msort_with_tmp
2005      1.7799  cc1                      cc1                     
bitmap_set_bit
1836      1.6299  cc1                      cc1                     
df_ref_create_structure
1775      1.5757  cc1                      cc1                     
find_reloads
1738      1.5429  cc1                      cc1                     
ggc_internal_alloc_stat
1538      1.3653  libc-2.11.1.so           libc-2.11.1.so           memset
1430      1.2694  cc1                      cc1                      eq_node
1375      1.2206  cc1                      cc1                     
preprocess_constraints
1317      1.1691  libc-2.11.1.so           libc-2.11.1.so           _int_free
1309      1.1620  cc1                      cc1                     
df_insn_refs_collect
1289      1.1443  cc1                      cc1                     
ix86_function_arg_regno_p
1277      1.1336  cc1                      cc1                     
df_ref_record
1249      1.1088  cc1                      cc1                     
ix86_save_reg
1215      1.0786  cc1                      cc1                     
ix86_compute_frame_layout
1171      1.0395  libc-2.11.1.so           libc-2.11.1.so          
malloc_consolidate
1134      1.0067  cc1                      cc1                     
extract_insn

So I don't get that much of RA by itself.  Tracking that malloc ineffeciency
might be low hanging fruit.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]