This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug tree-optimization/46297] [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/g77/980701-0.f FAILs with -Os -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46297

--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> 2010-11-15 18:05:11 UTC ---
On 11/15/10 08:14, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46297
>
> --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther<rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org>  2010-11-15 15:10:12 UTC ---
> (In reply to comment #6)
>> On 11/15/10 05:40, bernds at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46297
>>>
>>> Bernd Schmidt<bernds at gcc dot gnu.org>   changed:
>>>
>>>              What    |Removed                     |Added
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>                    CC|                            |bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
>>>
>>> --- Comment #5 from Bernd Schmidt<bernds at gcc dot gnu.org>   2010-11-15 12:30:26 UTC ---
>>> Jeff, what have you found?
>>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-11/msg00634.html
>>
>> Waiting for review...
> You don't need explicit approval for this middle-end patch.
Noted.  More than happy to consider postreload.c part of the middle end :-)

I wouldn't mind hearing from Bernd to ensure that I'm marking the reg as 
being used in an unknown fashion correctly, but if I haven't heard from 
him in a few days, I'll go ahead and check it in.

jeff


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]