This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/46297] [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/g77/980701-0.f FAILs with -Os -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables
- From: "law at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 18:10:09 +0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/46297] [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/g77/980701-0.f FAILs with -Os -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-46297-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46297
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> 2010-11-15 18:05:11 UTC ---
On 11/15/10 08:14, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46297
>
> --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther<rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-15 15:10:12 UTC ---
> (In reply to comment #6)
>> On 11/15/10 05:40, bernds at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46297
>>>
>>> Bernd Schmidt<bernds at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
>>>
>>> What |Removed |Added
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> CC| |bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
>>>
>>> --- Comment #5 from Bernd Schmidt<bernds at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-15 12:30:26 UTC ---
>>> Jeff, what have you found?
>>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-11/msg00634.html
>>
>> Waiting for review...
> You don't need explicit approval for this middle-end patch.
Noted. More than happy to consider postreload.c part of the middle end :-)
I wouldn't mind hearing from Bernd to ensure that I'm marking the reg as
being used in an unknown fashion correctly, but if I haven't heard from
him in a few days, I'll go ahead and check it in.
jeff