This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/45399] [C++0x] Warning for \0 in raw strings


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45399

--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-08 18:31:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> As you can see, I somehow believe that "\n" and "\r" are not interpreted
> correctly and replace these (should it be necessary, at least at one time it
> was?) and then added the same for chr(0) later on.

There's no need to replace newlines. There's only a need to replace nuls to
avoid a warning.  Carriage returns in the source code seem to get stripped from
the raw string.

> And the intention of a C++ feature, since when did it ever come to limit its
> use?

Agreed, I was just answering your question "What else is the purpose of raw
strings other than to contain binary blobs?"


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]