This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/46145] [C++0x] Should defaulted copy constructor imply default move constructor?
- From: "tom.prince at ualberta dot net" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 04:55:21 +0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/46145] [C++0x] Should defaulted copy constructor imply default move constructor?
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-46145-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46145
--- Comment #1 from tom.prince at ualberta dot net 2010-10-23 04:55:18 UTC ---
Created attachment 22131
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22131
Test case