This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/46024] New: g++.dg/warn/miss-format-1.C FAILs on Solaris 8 and 9
- From: "ro at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 18:24:20 +0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/46024] New: g++.dg/warn/miss-format-1.C FAILs on Solaris 8 and 9
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46024
Summary: g++.dg/warn/miss-format-1.C FAILs on Solaris 8 and 9
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: ro@gcc.gnu.org
Host: i386-pc-solaris2.[89], sparc-sun-solaris2.8
Target: i386-pc-solaris2.[89], sparc-sun-solaris2.8
Build: i386-pc-solaris2.[89], sparc-sun-solaris2.8
Created attachment 22043
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22043
preprocessed input (from Solaris 8/x86) for miss-format-1.C
The g++.dg/warn/miss-format-1.C FAILs on both Solaris 8 and 9/x86 and
Solaris 8/SPARC, but not on Solaris 9/SPARC:
i386-pc-solaris2.8:
FAIL: g++.dg/warn/miss-format-1.C printf attribute warning (test for warnings,
line 17)
FAIL: g++.dg/warn/miss-format-1.C printf attribute warning 2 (test for
warnings, line 42)
FAIL: g++.dg/warn/miss-format-1.C (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/miss-format-1.C:26:18:
error: 'vscanf' was not declared in this scope
i386-pc-solaris2.9:
FAIL: g++.dg/warn/miss-format-1.C printf attribute warning (test for warnings,
line 17)
FAIL: g++.dg/warn/miss-format-1.C printf attribute warning 2 (test for
warnings, line 42)
sparc-sun-solaris2.8:
FAIL: g++.dg/warn/miss-format-1.C (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/miss-format-1.C:26:18:
error: 'vscanf' was not declared in this scope
It seems strange to get that excess error even though there's a dg-error
covering exactly that situation.
But what's even more strange is that the Solaris 8 and 9/x86 compilers don't
warn for lines 17 and 42 for exactly the same preprocessed input that the
Solaris 8/SPARC compiler warns about:
s8sparc% gcc -Wmissing-format-attribute -S miss-format-1.ii
miss-format-1.ii: In function 'void foo(const char*, ...)':
miss-format-1.ii:123:19: warning: function might be possible candidate for
'gnu_printf' format attribute [-Wmissing-format-attribute]
miss-format-1.ii: In function 'void bar(const char*, ...)':
miss-format-1.ii:131:18: error: 'vscanf' was not declared in this scope
miss-format-1.ii: In function 'void vfoo(const char*, va_list)':
miss-format-1.ii:145:20: warning: function might be possible candidate for
'gnu_printf' format attribute [-Wmissing-format-attribute]
s9x86% gcc -Wmissing-format-attribute -S miss-format-1.ii
miss-format-1.s8x86.ii: In function 'void bar(const char*, ...)':
miss-format-1.s8x86.ii:131:18: error: 'vscanf' was not declared in this scope
I'd have expected such a warning to be target-independent.