This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug bootstrap/45612] [4.6 regression] Reference to undefined label building libada on Solaris 2/SPARC
- From: "dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 15:32:08 +0000
- Subject: [Bug bootstrap/45612] [4.6 regression] Reference to undefined label building libada on Solaris 2/SPARC
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-45612-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45612
--- Comment #12 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-09-28 15:32:01 UTC ---
> Hi,
> I would really apprechiate the answer to comment #6. Since the patch should
> only
> introduce more (valid) inlining this must be latent bug somewhere....
In the hppa-hpux case, the label would have had to be a code label.
The linker and dynamic loader don't support label differences between
code and data symbols. This suggests that the change exposed an
inlining bug that removed the symbol.
I'll take a look on my next build.
Dave