This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/45777] Missing temporary ?
- From: "Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:59:40 +0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/45777] Missing temporary ?
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-45777-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45777
--- Comment #4 from Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch> 2010-09-24 17:59:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> With Crayftn, there is no abort.
that also holds for NAG and g95, BTW.
> Thinking a bit about the program, I believe it is valid, i.e. gfortran has a
> wrong-code bug.
yes, I also think this testcase is valid.
One little bit more tricky (in my mind) is the case where one declares T as
'TYPE(T1) :: T' in S1. It could be that that is not valid.
--
Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.