This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug lto/45702] [4.6 Regression] New LTO test failures
- From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 17 Sep 2010 14:14:01 -0000
- Subject: [Bug lto/45702] [4.6 Regression] New LTO test failures
- References: <bug-45702-682@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de 2010-09-17 14:14 -------
Subject: Re: [4.6 Regression] New LTO test failures
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com wrote:
> ------- Comment #11 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-17 14:11 -------
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > Subject: Re: [4.6 Regression] New LTO test failures
> >
> > On Fri, 17 Sep 2010, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> >
> > > ------- Comment #8 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-17 14:04 -------
> > > Dejagnu adds it always for dg-do link/run, and there doesn't seem to be a way
> > > to bypass that.
> >
> > Hm, so I'd say blame it on the host system of HJ. Or alternatively
>
> As I said, it is a REGRESSION, which means it passed before.
> I believe it is caused by your --combine change. See:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2010-09/msg00267.html
Of course it is.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45702