This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/45369] problem with the associate statement
- From: "domob at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 21 Aug 2010 16:57:20 -0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/45369] problem with the associate statement
- References: <bug-45369-15125@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #2 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-21 16:57 -------
I only get a limited set of errors:
test.f03:188.10:
x_dist = pt1 % Get (X_COORD) - pt2 % Get (X_COORD)
1
Error: Unclassifiable statement at (1)
test.f03:189.10:
y_dist = pt1 % Get (Y_COORD) - pt2 % Get (Y_COORD)
1
Error: Unclassifiable statement at (1)
test.f03:217.16:
return_value = pt2d % Get (mold)
1
Error: Alternate RETURN statement at (1) is only allowed within a SUBROUTINE
test.f03:234.12:
return_value = point_2d % Get ()
1
Error: Alternate RETURN statement at (1) is only allowed within a SUBROUTINE
test.f03:249.21:
call point_2d % Print ()
1
Error: VARIABLE attribute of 'point_2d' conflicts with PROCEDURE attribute at
(1
)
test.f03:273.21:
call point_2d % Set (coordinates)
1
Error: VARIABLE attribute of 'point_2d' conflicts with PROCEDURE attribute at
(1
)
test.f03:297.29:
use Pt3d_mod, only : pt3d_t
1
Fatal Error: Can't open module file 'pt3d_mod.mod' for reading at (1): No such
f
ile or directory
These are currently expected, because the parser does not know pt1 or pt2 are
derived-types and thus rejects a component-reference on them. This is what I
meant with the statement, that ASSOCIATE is not yet completely working for
derived-types, see PR 38936.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 38936 ***
--
domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45369