This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/45108] Namelist read: Not aborted when reading from STDIN
- From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 28 Jul 2010 15:07:05 -0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/45108] Namelist read: Not aborted when reading from STDIN
- References: <bug-45108-13404@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-28 15:07 -------
See also: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/Extensions-to-namelist.html
I understand the support of ? and =?, but why can't one give a proper error is
one returns? If one starts a dialog with ? / =?, one stays in the I/O, but if
one returns, a proper error should be used - at least if one has never started
a ? / =? conversation.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45108