This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/45093] Different definitions of _Rb_tree::{erase,_M_destroy_node} between C++98 and C++0x
- From: "paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 27 Jul 2010 11:14:15 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/45093] Different definitions of _Rb_tree::{erase,_M_destroy_node} between C++98 and C++0x
- References: <bug-45093-19458@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #2 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-07-27 11:14 -------
Well, this specific snippet will work at some point, because we want to use
namespace association for the C++0x containers. Of course no binary
compatibility in general, C++0x and C++98 code will not be allowed in general
to interoperate, for *many* reasons (just as an example std::list will be
changed to have a constant time size in C++0x)
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45093