This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug middle-end/37060] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Bogus __builtin___memcpy_chk overflow warning



------- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-07-26 09:06 -------
(In reply to comment #11)
> I think this testcase has some other issues at least on the trunk.
> sparc_floating_p.isra.0 is produced for 32bit but not 64bit.
> 
> 
> And then we have:
> MEM[(const struct type *)type_1(D)].code;
> 
> Why didn't we just produce an indirect reference here as the const should be
> able to be ignored?  (CCing Richard about that part).

There are no more INDIRECT_REFs.  The above is type_1->code, just not
pretty printed as such.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37060


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]