This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug middle-end/37060] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Bogus __builtin___memcpy_chk overflow warning


------- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-07-25 00:04 -------
I think this testcase has some other issues at least on the trunk.
sparc_floating_p.isra.0 is produced for 32bit but not 64bit.


And then we have:
MEM[(const struct type *)type_1(D)].code;

Why didn't we just produce an indirect reference here as the const should be
able to be ignored?  (CCing Richard about that part).


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37060
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]