[Bug c++/44486] New: missing space in __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ expansion in anonymous namespace

["msebor at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

The "S<unnamed>::f()" text reads as though S were a template. I suspect the
text is simply missing a space between the S and <unnamed> but I wonder if
the <unnamed> bit could actually be replaced by something less ambiguous
in C++ (such as /* unnamed */ or perhaps better still, /* anonymous */).

Btw., since glibc uses __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ in its definition of the assert()
macro this shows up in quite a bit of output.

$ cat t.cpp && g++ -dumpversion && g++ t.cpp && ./a.out
#include <cstdio>

struct S { };
namespace { S f() { std::puts(__PRETTY_FUNCTION__); return S(); } }

int main() { f(); }

4.4.3
S<unnamed>::f()


-- 
           Summary: missing space in __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ expansion in
                    anonymous namespace
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.4.3
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: msebor at gmail dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44486