This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug tree-optimization/44182] [4.5/4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O1



------- Comment #5 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-05-27 15:44 -------
The context in which stmt_can_throw_internal is being called is different
pre- and post-inlining, so of course the answer could be different.  This
is neither surprising nor a bug.

I even tend to doubt (without checking of course) whether this is a regression
with the EH rewrite, since I would expect the same new EH edge to have appeared
with the old EH code -- anything less would have been a bug in the old EH code.
However, in order to see the bug one also needs the VTA code present, which 
means looking at the redhat-4.4 branch.

So yes, Jakub, I think the inliner needs to do something to clean up the debug
statement that would appear alone in that new block.  I suppose such debug
statements would have to be dropped to avoid changing the code due to changes
in the CFG.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44182


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]