[Bug c/44252] New: fixincludes fork vs. vms

["jay dot krell at cornell dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

Vms doesn't have fork.
  It does have vfork/exec.
Fixincludes uses fork.
It appears fixincludes uses it in two ways:
 1) can be replaced by vfork?
 2) subject to configuration and easily avoided


Really -- I would suggest just use the more portable form in the case of #2 and
don't bother with any need to configure anything. It is to much slower to be
worth any hassle?


As well, libiberty's pex might be useful here -- to replace (v)fork/exe use.


I have an obvious two line patch but it is not yet tested -- fork -> vfork and
add a line to autoconf.


Also the two lines that check for x86-mingw and x86_64-mingw should just check
for mingw imho.


-- 
           Summary: fixincludes fork vs. vms
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: jay dot krell at cornell dot edu
 GCC build triplet: i686-apple-darwin9
  GCC host triplet: alpha-dec-vms
GCC target triplet: alpha-dec-vms


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44252