This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/43853] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20090126-1 c_lto_20090126-1_0.o-c_lto_20090126-1_0.o
- From: "hp at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 29 Apr 2010 21:16:12 -0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/43853] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20090126-1 c_lto_20090126-1_0.o-c_lto_20090126-1_0.o
- References: <bug-43853-682@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #1 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-29 21:16 -------
I'm unsure whether I should tag along on this PR, because the failing range
(last_worked:first_failed) for cris-elf is 158755:158765, which doesn't include
158610. But, I'm doing it anyhow. From gcc-restresults@ it looks like it's
highly host-dependent, but occurring for many targets. My host system is
running Fedora 12, updated about a month ago, gcc-4.4.3-4.fc12.x86_64,
binutils-2.19.51.0.14-37.fc12.x86_64, glibc-2.11.1-1.x86_64. The internal
error message in my gcc.log from r158788 is just (besides the usual ICE
message):
lto1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
--
hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-04-29 21:16:11
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43853