This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/43605] [4.4/4.5 Regression] wrong results with ftell
- From: "jb at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 1 Apr 2010 19:45:45 -0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/43605] [4.4/4.5 Regression] wrong results with ftell
- References: <bug-43605-9562@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #14 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-01 19:45 -------
(In reply to comment #13)
> (In reply to comment #12)
> >
> > 0
> > '123456'
> > 7
> > 'DDDDDDDDDDDDD'
> > 113
> >
> > I would expect '789' and 10. Am I wrong?
> >
>
> On i686 I get with trunk rev.157914:
>
> 0
> '123456'
> 7
> '789'
> 11
>
>
> I get the same result with ifort 11.1 and Sunstudio 12.1
> when I replace call ftell(10,i) by i=ftell(10).
Fascinating. On x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu with 4.5 r157911 I get
0
'123456'
99
'789'
99
With r157914 I get
0
'123456'
7
'DDDDDDDDDDDDD'
113
I.e. same as Dominique. The correct result, I believe, is
0
'123456'
7
'789'
11
which is what I get with 4.1.2 and 4.4.0.
Anyways, thanks for the bugreports guys, but since trunk freezes in 1h15min, a
fix for this won't make 4.5.0.
--
jb at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43605