This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug middle-end/43602] ___emutls_v.__gcov_indirect_call_[counters|callee] undefined on *-*-darwin*



------- Comment #17 from bonzini at gnu dot org  2010-04-01 15:42 -------
Subject: Re:  ___emutls_v.__gcov_indirect_call_[counters|callee]
 undefined on *-*-darwin*

On 04/01/2010 01:27 PM, howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu wrote:
> ------- Comment #14 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu  2010-04-01 11:27 -------
> Reverting back to...
>
> TREE_PUBLIC (ic_void_ptr_var) = 0;
>
> in the proposed patch results in the missing symbols again.
> Can we just leave...
>
> TREE_PUBLIC (ic_void_ptr_var) = 1;

No, I don't see how this can be correct.

The symbols must _not_ be coalesced, that's why TREE_PUBLIC is zero.

Paolo


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43602


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]