This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug fortran/43591] PPC: internal compiler error: in gfc_traverse_expr, at fortran/expr.c:3604



------- Comment #7 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr  2010-04-01 12:17 -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> What is invaild about the code is that t1%p1() and t2%p2() are not
> initialization expressions.  Everthing works fine, when the tables are
> allocatable.

That was the origin of my question about the validity of the code.

> BTW: gfortran produces correct code for the variant when the procedures are not
> procedure pointers.  I stumpled over this OCE when rewriting some code.

Why would this make the code valid?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43591


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]