This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/40436] [4.5 regression] 0.5% code size regression caused by r147852
- From: "hubicka at ucw dot cz" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 28 Mar 2010 17:30:37 -0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/40436] [4.5 regression] 0.5% code size regression caused by r147852
- References: <bug-40436-374@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #21 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2010-03-28 17:30 -------
Subject: Re: [4.5 regression] 0.5% code size
regression caused by r147852
> > I think I saw one but it was wrong. I would be interested to at least know
> > what this patch is about :)
>
> It's about not accounting static called once functions twice when
> decreasing overall unit size.
Ah, I saw that one and I think it was wrong (and that is also why it regressed
on tramp3d). I will dig it out.
Honza
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40436