This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug tree-optimization/40436] [4.5 regression] 0.5% code size regression caused by r147852



------- Comment #18 from rguenther at suse dot de  2010-03-28 16:43 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.5 regression] 0.5% code size
 regression caused by r147852

On Sun, 28 Mar 2010, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote:

> ------- Comment #17 from hubicka at ucw dot cz  2010-03-28 16:33 -------
> Subject: Re:  [4.5 regression] 0.5% code size
>         regression caused by r147852
> 
> > Indeed.
> > 
> > There is also some miscounting of overall unit size, Micha has a patch for
> > that (but it completely chokes tramp3d results).  There is also the
> 
> Where is the patch?

Somewhere - you have to as Micha.

> > early inliner cleanups I have done at some point.  Thus, I suppose we can
> > look at this early during 4.6 development again.
> 
> Well, those should not affect the resulting inlining, right?

In theory not.  In practice it removes the iteration if I remember
correctly.

Richard.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40436


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]