This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/40436] [4.5 regression] 0.5% code size regression caused by r147852
- From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 28 Mar 2010 16:43:21 -0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/40436] [4.5 regression] 0.5% code size regression caused by r147852
- References: <bug-40436-374@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #18 from rguenther at suse dot de 2010-03-28 16:43 -------
Subject: Re: [4.5 regression] 0.5% code size
regression caused by r147852
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote:
> ------- Comment #17 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2010-03-28 16:33 -------
> Subject: Re: [4.5 regression] 0.5% code size
> regression caused by r147852
>
> > Indeed.
> >
> > There is also some miscounting of overall unit size, Micha has a patch for
> > that (but it completely chokes tramp3d results). There is also the
>
> Where is the patch?
Somewhere - you have to as Micha.
> > early inliner cleanups I have done at some point. Thus, I suppose we can
> > look at this early during 4.6 development again.
>
> Well, those should not affect the resulting inlining, right?
In theory not. In practice it removes the iteration if I remember
correctly.
Richard.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40436