This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug tree-optimization/43528] ICE: in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:6198 with -mms-bitfields at x86_64-linux



------- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-03-26 10:05 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> There is a mismatch in a guard expression.  Following patch fixes ICE for me
> (I'm not sure if it makes any sense, though):
> 
> Index: stor-layout.c
> ===================================================================
> --- stor-layout.c       (revision 157742)
> +++ stor-layout.c       (working copy)
> @@ -1346,8 +1346,8 @@ place_field (record_layout_info rli, tre
>              until we see a bitfield (and come by here again) we just skip
>              calculating it.  */
>           if (DECL_SIZE (field) != NULL
> -             && host_integerp (TYPE_SIZE (TREE_TYPE (field)), 0)
> -             && host_integerp (DECL_SIZE (field), 0))
> +             && host_integerp (TYPE_SIZE (TREE_TYPE (field)), 1)
> +             && host_integerp (DECL_SIZE (field), 1))
>             {
>               HOST_WIDE_INT bitsize = tree_low_cst (DECL_SIZE (field), 1);
>               HOST_WIDE_INT typesize
> 

The patch is pre-approved if it passes bootstrap & regtest.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43528


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]