This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/43333] [4.5 Regression] __is_pod seems broken
- From: "matz at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 22 Mar 2010 16:54:39 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/43333] [4.5 Regression] __is_pod seems broken
- References: <bug-43333-12182@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #10 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-22 16:54 -------
Hmm, well, but there's code out there that expects the "old" TR1 semantic,
namely blocxx, and if the definition is indeed muddled than IMNSHO we should
retain the behaviour as it was in older GCC versions, instead of breaking
existing code.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43333