This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug middle-end/40106] [4.4/4.5 Regression] Weird interaction between optimize_insn_for_speed_p and -funsafe-math-optimizations



------- Comment #39 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr  2010-03-16 15:49 -------
> Especially on embedded targets with soft-float the multiplication would
> add a significant code size penalty.

Even in this case this would strongly of the code. It may be true if other
pieces require log and exp. If not I seriously doubt that replacing the code
for multiplies and square roots will be larger than the code for log and exp.

My (very limited) understanding of this issue is that at some point x*sqrt(x)
is replaced with pow(x,1.5) (so that pow(x,a)*pow(x,b) is optimized as
pow(x,a+b)). So even if the programmer write x*sqrt(x) (s)he can end up with
pow(x,1.5), resulting in poor performances in term of both speed and size (not
speaking of accuracy).


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40106


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]