This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug bootstrap/43287] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap fails at stage 1 on powerpc-apple-darwin9
- From: "developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 9 Mar 2010 08:54:14 -0000
- Subject: [Bug bootstrap/43287] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap fails at stage 1 on powerpc-apple-darwin9
- References: <bug-43287-12313@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #14 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-03-09 08:54 -------
(In reply to comment #12)
> Bootstrapping all languages minus ADA with the patch in comment #10 succeeded
> at revision 157293.
at 157294 (minus ada and java) with the patch.
I see the following new 4.5 regressions (possibly unrelated)
FAIL: gcc.dg/vmx/7-01.c -O3 -g (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gcc.dg/vmx/7-01.c -O3 -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/vmx/7-01a.c -O3 -g (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gcc.dg/vmx/7-01a.c -O3 -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/vmx/fft.c -O3 -g (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gcc.dg/vmx/fft.c -O3 -g (test for excess errors)
> > Needs testing on darwin as well as verification that there
> > really isn't any indirection etc. missed (i.e. that (lo_sum ((reg X),
> > (symbol_ref "foo"))) is always equivalent to (symbol_ref "foo").
>
> I'll try to some testing in the coming nights, but I am leaving the
> "verification ..." to those who really know the details about Darwin.
ditto [157304 is building at present] - but, to be sure, this needs someone
familiar with the nitty gritty of macho.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43287