This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/43215] x86-64: Nonstandard instruction "movd %xmm0, %rax"
- From: "hjl dot tools at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 1 Mar 2010 15:42:01 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/43215] x86-64: Nonstandard instruction "movd %xmm0, %rax"
- References: <bug-43215-15193@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-01 15:42 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> I fail to see why binutils accepting both version should be a reason to
> not fix gcc.
>
What is the minimum binutils required by gcc? Does it support movq?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43215