This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c/43128] [4.5 Regression] c-c++-common/pr41779.c doesn't work



------- Comment #18 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-02-22 23:56 -------
(In reply to comment #17)
> suggest having a c_ep_convert_and_check or similar function that handles 
> excess precision: it would take the result type, the semantic result type 
> (the type that gets used eventually to build an EXCESS_PRECISION_EXPR) and 
> the value to convert.  It would just call convert_and_check, ignoring the 
> semantic type, *except* when the operand has integer type *and* the 
> semantic type is non-NULL; in that case, it would first convert to the 
> semantic type them to the result type.

Wouldn't that change the normal result of promotion rules?

Also, why call convert_and_check ignoring the semantic type and not just call
convert? The excess precision type should be large enough to not cause any
problem that needs checking.


> 


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43128


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]