This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug bootstrap/36481] gcc fails to build on Solaris x86 - it forgets the locations of libmpfr
- From: "david dot kirkby at onetel dot net" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 15 Jan 2010 13:15:41 -0000
- Subject: [Bug bootstrap/36481] gcc fails to build on Solaris x86 - it forgets the locations of libmpfr
- References: <bug-36481-16025@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #18 from david dot kirkby at onetel dot net 2010-01-15 13:15 -------
Subject: Re: gcc fails to build on Solaris x86 - it
forgets the locations of libmpfr
BlanchardJ at ieee dot org wrote:
> ------- Comment #17 from BlanchardJ at ieee dot org 2010-01-15 12:37 -------
>
>> Yes, thank you. That is helpful. How do you produce the $ISALIST? Is that
>> simply
>> sparcv9 on a modern SPARC and amd64 on an Open Solaris system, or is it a list.
>> If the latter, how do you every it.
>>
>>
>> drkirkby@hawk:~$ isalist
>> amd64 pentium_pro+mmx pentium_pro pentium+mmx pentium i486 i386 i86
>>
>> Do I need
>>
>> xport LD_OPTIONS='-R/opt/csw/lib/amd64 -R opt/csw/lib/pentium_pro+mmx etc" ? I
>> doubt it, but I'm not sure what you mean there.
>>
>> Is it just this, or anything else I need to do? You say "typical blastwave
>> build
>> would have at a minimum .." but I doubt you would consider gcc a "typical
>> blastwave build" If there are further complications, can you let me know what
>> they are.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> It's just the string '$ISALIST' so it will appear as-is in the final run path.
> The runtime linker will take care of expanding it correctly at runtime. So one
> just export LD_OPTIONS as-is before building.
>
>
Thank you. That's very helpful. I really hate having to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH -
it
is particularly an issue if you have multiple compilers. There's alyways the
chance it gets set to the wrong compiler by mistake.
Dave
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36481