[Bug fortran/40849] String extraction for translation fails when concatenating with preprocessor symbols

["burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

------- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-01-04 07:31 -------
Subject: Bug 40849

Author: burnus
Date: Mon Jan  4 07:30:49 2010
New Revision: 155606

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155606
Log:
2009-01-04  Tobias Burnus  <burnus@net-b.de>

        PR fortran/41872
        * trans-expr.c (gfc_conv_procedure_call): Add indirect ref
        for functions returning allocatable scalars.
        * trans-stmt.c (gfc_trans_allocate): Emmit error when
        reallocating an allocatable scalar.
        * trans.c (gfc_allocate_with_status): Fix pseudocode syntax
        in comment.
        * trans-decl.c (gfc_trans_deferred_vars): Nullify local
        allocatable scalars.
        (gfc_generate_function_code): Nullify result variable for
        allocatable scalars.

        PR fortran/40849
        * module.c (gfc_use_module): Fix warning string to allow
        for translation.

        PR fortran/42517
        * invoke.texi (-fcheck=recursion): Mention that the checking
        is also disabled for -frecursive.
        * trans-decl.c (gfc_generate_function_code): Disable
        -fcheck=recursion when -frecursive is used.

        * intrinsic.texi (iso_c_binding): Improve wording.

2009-01-04  Tobias Burnus  <burnus@net-b.de>

        PR fortran/41872
        * gfortran.dg/allocatable_scalar_5.f90: New test.
        * gfortran.dg/allocatable_scalar_6.f90: New test.


Added:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/allocatable_scalar_5.f90
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/allocatable_scalar_6.f90
Modified:
    trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.texi
    trunk/gcc/fortran/invoke.texi
    trunk/gcc/fortran/module.c
    trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c
    trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
    trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.c
    trunk/gcc/fortran/trans.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40849