This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/41975] unordered_set::erase performs worse when nearly empty
- From: "paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 6 Nov 2009 23:50:20 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/41975] unordered_set::erase performs worse when nearly empty
- References: <bug-41975-11470@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-11-06 23:50 -------
You are right that bucket_size != size. Now, can you imagine a way to fix this?
Otherwise, I agree, we should raise the issue, do you want to do that, maybe on
the library reflector?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41975