This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/39626] Correctly implement details of Fortran 2008 BLOCK construct
- From: "domob at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 29 Sep 2009 07:49:33 -0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/39626] Correctly implement details of Fortran 2008 BLOCK construct
- References: <bug-39626-16338@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #7 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-29 07:49 -------
Also, Tobias mentioned (in the linked thread):
The patch looks good to me. It sometimes makes the diagnostics less
useful, e.g. for
recursive function func(i)
integer :: i, func
func = 1
entry func2(i)
block
func2 = func(1)
end block
end function func
But the same "Unclassifiable statement" one gets if one not only removes
"(end )block" but also "recursive".
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39626