This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug java/41260] [4.5 Regression] major regressions in libjava testsuite between 4.4.1 and gcc trunk caused by r147995
- From: "howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 5 Sep 2009 15:25:55 -0000
- Subject: [Bug java/41260] [4.5 Regression] major regressions in libjava testsuite between 4.4.1 and gcc trunk caused by r147995
- References: <bug-41260-11113@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #12 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-09-05 15:25 -------
In r147989, we had no regressions in x86_64-apple-darwin10 in the g++
testsuite. However, in r148013 (which is after the fix for PR 40304), we have
the following g++ testsuite failures which still exist in gcc trunk on
x86_64-apple-darwin10...
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic73.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/eh/delayslot1.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/eh/ia64-2.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/eh/simd-1.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/eh/simd-2.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/eh/synth2.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/cleanup-8.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/cleanup-9.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/init/array16.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/init/array5.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/init/ref9.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/opt/eh2.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/stackalign/eh-vararg-2.C -O0 execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/stackalign/eh-vararg-2.C -O1 execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/stackalign/eh-vararg-2.C -O2 execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/stackalign/eh-vararg-2.C -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/stackalign/eh-vararg-2.C -O3 -g execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/stackalign/throw-1.C -O0 execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/stackalign/throw-1.C -O1 execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/stackalign/eh-vararg-2.C -O0 execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/stackalign/eh-vararg-2.C -O1 execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/stackalign/eh-vararg-2.C -O2 execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/stackalign/eh-vararg-2.C -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/stackalign/eh-vararg-2.C -O3 -g execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/stackalign/throw-1.C -O0 execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/stackalign/throw-1.C -O1 execution test
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.abi/cxa_vec.C execution test
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.eh/badalloc1.C execution test
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.eh/rethrow3.C execution test
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.eh/vbase2.C execution test
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.martin/new1.C execution test
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/eh2.C execution test
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/eh29.C execution test
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/eh41.C execution test
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/eh44.C execution test
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.oliva/delete3.C execution test
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.other/array1.C execution test
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init7.C execution test
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.other/singleton.C execution test
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb50.C execution test
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eh990323-5.C execution test
Any idea of which of these would present the easy opportunity for debugging the
problem?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41260