This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/39626] Fortran 2008: Implement BLOCK construct
- From: "domob at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 30 Aug 2009 10:00:24 -0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/39626] Fortran 2008: Implement BLOCK construct
- References: <bug-39626-16338@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #2 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-30 10:00 -------
I'm not sure it needs really that much changes... After all, the semantics can
probably be simulated completely via replacing the BLOCK-constructs with
contained procedures that are called where the BLOCK originally was?
That's of course not a nice implementation and I do not think we should
actually do this, but I believe that there needs not be that much change --
I'll work on this and try to find out a good way.
--
domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |domob at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2009-04-03 16:43:38 |2009-08-30 10:00:24
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39626