This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/31593] Invariant DO loop variables and subroutines
- From: "Tobias Schlüter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 15 Aug 2009 10:17:30 -0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/31593] Invariant DO loop variables and subroutines
- References: <bug-31593-10391@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #33 from =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Tobias_Schl=FCter?=
<tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de> 2009-08-15 10:17 -------
Subject: Re: Invariant DO loop variables and subroutines
jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk wrote:
> ------- Comment #32 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-08-15 10:05 -------
> (In reply to comment #29)
>
>> It's the other way around: If output were to modify any of its
>> arguments, the program would be illegal. Therefore, the compiler can
>> assume that this doesn't happen. Intent(in) would be redundant for this
>> particular case (though useful, so the compiler could easier detect
>> errors).
> that's true for pX, but value can be modified by output. I.e. this is (afaict)
> valid fortran that write the numbers from 1 to 10
> n=10
> DO i=1,n
> n=0
> write(6,*)i
> ENDDO
Actually, we're buggy there, and my patch fixes it. I'm just now trying
out testcases.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31593