This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/40915] [4.5 Regressions] FAIL: 18_support/headers/exception/synopsis.cc (test for excess errors)
- From: "paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 30 Jul 2009 15:05:26 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/40915] [4.5 Regressions] FAIL: 18_support/headers/exception/synopsis.cc (test for excess errors)
- References: <bug-40915-276@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #2 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-07-30 15:05 -------
Decorating the declaration in the testcase too would of course fix the problem
in the trivial way. Now however, I'm rather worried by the fact itself that
those decorations we are adding for optimization purposes can be *easily*
detected, for example, in conformance suites too... Honza did you review the
Standard already in order to make sure we are still strictly conforming in such
cases?!?
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |paolo at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org, jh at suse dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40915