This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug regression/40800] libcpp breaks bootstrap
- From: "sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 19 Jul 2009 05:30:16 -0000
- Subject: [Bug regression/40800] libcpp breaks bootstrap
- References: <bug-40800-10110@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #11 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2009-07-19 05:30 -------
Subject: Re: libcpp breaks bootstrap
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 05:09:31AM -0000, jlquinn at optonline dot net wrote:
>
>
> ------- Comment #10 from jlquinn at optonline dot net 2009-07-19 05:09 -------
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > Looks like the configure is broken.
>
> One thing I can see from the log is that configure is acting as if
> ENABLE_BUILD_WITH_CXX is enabled. Can you try the following patch on
> libcpp/configure, and see if that fixes the problem?
>
>
> Index: configure
> ===================================================================
> --- configure (revision 149777)
> +++ configure (working copy)
> @@ -3342,7 +3342,7 @@
> ac_config_commands="$ac_config_commands depdir"
>
>
> -if test "$ENABLE_BUILD_WITH_CXX" == "no"; then
> +if test "$ENABLE_BUILD_WITH_CXX" = "no"; then
> depcc="$CC" am_compiler_list=
>
> am_depcomp=$ac_aux_dir/depcomp
> @@ -3674,7 +3674,7 @@
> # AC_CHECK_HEADERS is repeated to work around apparent autoconf 2.59 bug. If
> # AC_CHECK_HEADERS comes after the if clause, the last AC_LANG call gets used,
> # no matter which branch is taken.
> -if test "$ENABLE_BUILD_WITH_CXX" == "no"; then
> +if test "$ENABLE_BUILD_WITH_CXX" = "no"; then
> ac_ext=c
> ac_cpp='$CPP $CPPFLAGS'
> ac_compile='$CC -c $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext >&5'
>
This patch appears to fix the problem. At least, bootstrap has made it
past the initial build of libcpp. I don't know if this is the correct
fix in that I know very little about autoconf.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40800