This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/40734] ICE on attempt to compile trivial Fortran program
- From: "al dot danial at ngc dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 13 Jul 2009 18:30:04 -0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/40734] ICE on attempt to compile trivial Fortran program
- References: <bug-40734-17942@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #3 from al dot danial at ngc dot com 2009-07-13 18:30 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> Fortran reports are never anything but "normal".
>
> However, would you really expect that a compiler would be released that can't
> handle code like the one quoted? I find it hard to believe, especially on a
> platform as common as i686-pc-linux-gnu.
>
> Does the C-compiler work? Something like ...
>
> $> cat hello.c
> #include <stdio.h>
> int main() {
> printf("hello\n");
> return 0;
> }
>
> $> gcc hello.c && ./a.out
>
> If not, I'd check configuration, compilation and installation.
The C compiler works fine. Yes, I'm puzzled by the inability of gfortran to
work at all. For what it's worth, I also built an x86_64 installation of 4.4.0
and on it gfortran works perfectly. My build procedure on the i686 machine is
identical to the procedure for x86_64 (except for the obvious difference of
pointing to 32 bit libraries instead of 64 bit for GMP and MPFR). I agree the
problem is most likely on my end however I'm at a loss to figure out why.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40734