This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug rtl-optimization/40667] [4.4/4.5 Regression] stack frames are generated even with -fomit-frame-pointer



------- Comment #10 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-07-09 16:24 -------
I'm not sure what you mean MINIMUM_TYPE_ALIGN should be.  A new type field? 
That would be IMHO an overkill, would enlarge types too much.
If it is just a macro, it should be probably MINIMUM_ALIGNMENT, not
MINIMUM_TYPE_ALIGN, and take a tree (TYPE or DECL), mode and initial alignment
and just return a possibly lower alignment.  So pretty much like
ix86_local_alignment, except that it would only ever decrease alignment, rather
than also increase it.  On most targets the macro would just return the third
argument.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40667


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]