This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug debug/40573] DWARF for inlined subroutines refers to the outlined copy



------- Comment #5 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-06-30 14:21 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Hmm, I tought GCC was doing the same thing for years.  So we need
> abstract function for each inline?

Why?  I think we each inlined copy (and the outlined copy) to refer to the one
abstract copy.  The problem is the links from the inlined copies to the
outlined copy.

Meanwhile I'll try to work around this in GDB.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40573


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]