This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug rtl-optimization/40086] [4.5 Regression]: cris-elf gfortran.dg/forall_1.f90 -O1 execution



------- Comment #13 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-05-14 00:12 -------
By chance I stumbled upon an old fix I did some years ago in which I changed a
use of next_active_insn to next_real insn (to avoid skipping USE insns).  You
can see it in comments referring to a now-deleted "main" use (the references
gone stale).  This PR is just the same bug in another place! I think I'll be
going for the same solution; it will reduce the number of filled delay-slots or
redirected jumps and removed redundant insns, but presumably safer as it will
not include moving or duplicating the USE insns.  It would also be solved by a
reorg rewrite, in which USE insns wouldn't be sprinkled into the insn stream,
sometimes ignored, sometimes incorrectly...


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40086


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]