This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/39932] [4.5 Regression] Revision 146831 caused many test failures
- From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 29 Apr 2009 14:20:35 -0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/39932] [4.5 Regression] Revision 146831 caused many test failures
- References: <bug-39932-682@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-29 14:20 -------
The only expected fails left should now be
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr34989-1.c (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr34989-1.c (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr34989-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr34989-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/struct/wo_prof_double_malloc.c (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gcc.dg/struct/wo_prof_double_malloc.c (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gcc.dg/struct/wo_prof_double_malloc.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/struct/wo_prof_double_malloc.c (test for excess errors)
all --combine ones, and
FAIL: libgomp.c++/task-4.C -O (internal compiler error)
FAIL: libgomp.c++/task-4.C -O (internal compiler error)
FAIL: libgomp.c++/task-4.C -O (test for excess errors)
FAIL: libgomp.c++/task-4.C -O (test for excess errors)
a bug wrt missing gimplification of VLA array type bounds.
This bug is now very confusing (as are all "revision blabla caused many
regression" bugs).
I will open two new bugs for the above and close this one.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39932