This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug objc/39753] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Objective-C(++) and C90 strict-aliasing interaction bug
- From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 13 Apr 2009 22:00:40 -0000
- Subject: [Bug objc/39753] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Objective-C(++) and C90 strict-aliasing interaction bug
- References: <bug-39753-17566@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-13 22:00 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> Is this really "broken" when the Apple compiler has the same behavior (assuming
> we all accept that the Apple Objective-C semantics are the de facto standard)?
Apple's compiler does not have the same behavior because they disable strict
aliasing by default for all languages.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39753