This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug bootstrap/33781] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] "Arg list too long" building libgcc.a
- From: "PHHargrove at lbl dot gov" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 7 Apr 2009 20:39:49 -0000
- Subject: [Bug bootstrap/33781] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] "Arg list too long" building libgcc.a
- References: <bug-33781-754@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #25 from PHHargrove at lbl dot gov 2009-04-07 20:39 -------
Has any progress been made on this bug?
I have hit this problem with gcc-4.3.2 on IRIX with both --disable-fixed-point
and --disable-decimal-float. Since this bug is open with a milestone of 4.3.4
I figured a switch to 4.3.3 was not likely to be productive.
However, I thought I would share the fact that I was able to make a little bit
of progress beyond what is described in the bug report.
The comment #21 from Ralf Wildenhues suggests he was about to fix the rule for
libgcc.map, but nothing appears about such a fix in the bug report. So, on my
own I was able to hack up the libgcc.map rule (in a way not suitable for
general use) to get past the failure described in comment #20.
Once past building libgcc.map, however, I find that the rule to build
libgcc_s.so is again hitting ARG_MAX, this time in the "xgcc ... -shared"
command to build the .so. I gave up at that point, being uncertain how to
automate the incremental construction of a .so (other than by using libtool).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33781