This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/39629] [4.5 Regression] Revision 145483 may have caused many failures
- From: "hjl dot tools at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 3 Apr 2009 22:17:59 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/39629] [4.5 Regression] Revision 145483 may have caused many failures
- References: <bug-39629-682@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-04-03 22:17 -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > (In reply to comment #3)
> > > Created an attachment (id=17584)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17584&action=view) [edit]
> > > Fix a mistake in operator precedence in bits/random.h (_ShiftMin1)
> > >
> > It still doesn't work for 32bit:
> >
> > /export/gnu/import/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/shared_ptr/thread/default_weaktoshared.cc:93:
>
> HJ, I'm sorry, I do not understand your english: you say "it *still* doesn't
> work", but this *specific* fail was not present in your initial list. Thus, is
> Ed's patchlet introducing one *additional* fail?
>
"make check" was clean before revision 145483. Now I have many failures
on 32bit. Revision 145508 with patch in comment #3 still have many failures
on 32bit.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39629