This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/38705] [4.4 Regression] ICE: canonical types differ for identical types const int and const AlpsNodeIndex_t
- From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 3 Jan 2009 11:28:28 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/38705] [4.4 Regression] ICE: canonical types differ for identical types const int and const AlpsNodeIndex_t
- References: <bug-38705-14147@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #8 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-03 11:28 -------
Yes. Just removing the restriction is wrong, because then volatile from the
wrong side of the copy would be used. So extra code would be needed to handle
that, and I really don't think it is worth it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38705