This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/38681] Internal compiler error. expr.c:6956 [Template instantiation with non-type value of member function ptr]
- From: "juvvij at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 31 Dec 2008 17:31:21 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/38681] Internal compiler error. expr.c:6956 [Template instantiation with non-type value of member function ptr]
- References: <bug-38681-17131@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #5 from juvvij at gmail dot com 2008-12-31 17:31 -------
>From the C++ standards doc (Latest download form the website) (excerpt listed
below), I thought that member functions could be allowed. I am not entirely
sure if *function* can also refer to *member-function*.
--------------------
4. A non-type template-parameter shall have one of the following (optionally
cv-qualified) types:
â?? integral or enumeration type,
â?? pointer to object or pointer to function,
â?? reference to object or reference to function,
â?? pointer to member., or
â?? in a constrained template (14.10), a type archetype T for which the
concept requirement std::NonTypeTemplateParamet
is part of the templateâ??s requirements.
--------------------
Did I understand this wrong ? Does the correct interpretation of the standard
not allow for member-function-pointers as non-type arguments ?
The following links point to a different interpretation.
http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=101628
http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=196204
http://objectmix.com/c/382443-samples-non-type-template-argument-other-than-integral-types.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38681