This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/38671] [4.4 Regression] extra code for setting up loops (IV-opts and 32bits vs 64bits)
- From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 31 Dec 2008 08:12:50 -0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/38671] [4.4 Regression] extra code for setting up loops (IV-opts and 32bits vs 64bits)
- References: <bug-38671-12873@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-31 08:12 -------
Confirmed, though I don't have a fully reduced testcase yet. Basically it
comes down to using unsigned int rather than size_t. If you had used size_t as
the index, the code would have worked correctly.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-12-31 08:12:50
date| |
Summary|[4.4 Regression] extra code |[4.4 Regression] extra code
|for setting up loops |for setting up loops (IV-
| |opts and 32bits vs 64bits)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38671